HIRA (Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment) Analysis to Identify Various Hazards and Occupational Risks at PT XYZ 32, Pakis, Malang


1Rizka Budiman, 2Dimas Indra Laksmana, 3Fourry Handoko
1Master student’s, Industrial Enginering Department, Postgraduate Program, National Institute of Technology (ITN) Malang, Jl. Sigura - Gura No.2, Sumbersari, Kec. Lowokwaru, Malang City, East Java 65145, Indonesian.
2,3Lecturer, Industrial Enginering Department, Postgraduate Program, National Institute of Technology (ITN) Malang, Indonesia, Jl. Sigura - Gura No.2, Sumbersari, Kec. Lowokwaru, Malang City, East Java 65145, Indonesian.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijirme.2025.v4i3n09

Abstract

PT XYZ 32, located in Pakis, Malang Indonesia is a company engaged in the aviation industry sector with a focus on creating a work environment free of incidents and accidents. The results of observations conducted at PT XYZ 32, Pakis Malang for 4 years show that attention to occupational health and safety is still lacking. This is evidenced by the presence of many hazard and risk factors that have the potential to cause work accidents. The purpose of this research is to identify risks using the HIRA (Hazzard Identification and Risk Assessment) method by defining the characteristics of hazards that may occur in the area and evaluating the risks that occur. The results show that there are five risks categorized as Extreme, which require immediate attention and handling because of the potential for serious impact. These risks are H13 - Exposure to acid when performing maintenance, H17 - Injury due to falling items when lifting or moving items, H25 - Injury due to errors in routine maintenance causing equipment malfunction, H26 - Exposure to noise from GPU machines that exceeds thresholds and H33 - Injury from handling sharp or hazardous waste without appropriate protection.

Keywords:

Aviation industry, Hazzard Identification, HIRA, Risk Assesment.

References:

1) Ambarani, A. Y., & Tualeka, A. R. (2017). Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (Hira) Pada Proses Fabrikasi Plate Tanki 42-T-501a Pt Pertamina (Persero) Ru Vi Balongan. The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, 5(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.20473/ijosh.v5i2.2020.192-203

2) Qingfeng, W., Wenbin, L., Xin, Z., Jianfeng, Y., & Qingbin, Y. (2021). Development and application of equipment maintenance and safety integrity management system. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 24(4), 321-332.

3) Ivana, A., Widjisena, B., & Jayanti, S. (2020). Analisa Komitmen Manajemen Rumah Sakit (RS) Terhadap Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) Pada RS Prima Medika Pemalang. 2(1), 35–41.

4) Standards Australia/ Standards New Zealand, As/Nzs 4360:1999 52 (2023).

5) Sudalma, & Rosnaini. (2020). K3 di Jawa Tengah: Analisis Tren Kecelakaan Kerja Tahun 2018. Researchgate, No. 1, 2356–0231.

6) T. Kontogiannis, Chiara Leva, Nora Balfe, , Emmanuel Plot, M. D. M. (2020). Total Safety Management: What are the Main Areas of Concern in the Integration of Best Available Methods and Tools Total Safety Management : what are the main area of concern in the integration of best available methods and tools . Chemical Engineering Transactions, 36(January). https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1436094

7) ZHI Xueyi, LAI Chunming, Z. C. (2018). Model of total safety management ( TSM ) and its application. SciVerse ScienceDirect, 45, 204–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.08.144