Abstract

This study examines the linguistic features in reader comments on Wattpad romance stories that construct the emotion of kilig. It focuses on two main questions: (1) What linguistic features (phonology, morphology, semantics) express kilig in comments, and how do they shape readers’ emotional experiences? (2) How is kilig portrayed as a Filipino emotion, and how does it influence readers’ emotional engagement? Using purposive sampling and textual analysis, the study investigates three completed Wattpad romance stories, emphasizing reader comments. Results show that phonological features like onomatopoeia and sound exaggeration, morphological elements like codeswitching and slang, and semantic features such as hyperbole and indirect attraction contribute to kilig. Emojis enhance emotional expression. Kilig as a cultural expression plays a key role in shaping readers’ emotional involvement by incorporating Filipino language, cultural nuances, and semiotic elements. This creates a sense of familiarity and emotional resonance, making kilig moments impactful. These linguistic and semiotic features reflect Filipino cultural ways of expressing emotions, with kilig's unique blend of excitement, joy, and playfulness captured through exaggeration, codeswitching, and local slang. Emojis, a part of digital communication, further connect with contemporary Filipino culture.

Keywords:

Wattpad, Romance Stories, Kilig, semiotics, emojis

References:

1) Angela Grabielle Nidar, & Mae, A. (2024). “Wattymania”: Wattpad Readers’ Perspective on Wattpad’s Role in Their Lives. International Journal of Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Education, 03(04). https://doi.org/10.58806/ijirme.2024.v3i4n12

2) Barnett, T. (2020). Hyperparatextuality: Meaning-making in the digital reading frame. Book 2.0, 10(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1386/btwo_00019_1

3) Basri and Andi Febriana Tamrin, B. (2024). OSF. Osf.io. https://osf.io/preprints/inarxiv/e2nh6 4

) Berengueres, J., & Castro, D. (2017). Sentiment Perception of Readers and Writers in Emoji use. ArXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1710.00888

5) Budiarti, D., & Nur, I. (2023). “Jangan Di-Read!”: Indonesian Affixation to English Words on Social Media. LITE Jurnal Bahasa Sastra Dan Budaya, 19(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v19i1.7492

6) Creative, V. (2012, October 18). Wattpad: Building the world’s biggest reader and writer community. The Literary Platform. https://theliteraryplatform.com/news/2012/10/wattpad-building-theworlds-biggest-reader-and-writer-community/

7) Grosz, P. G., Greenberg, G., De Leon, C., & Kaiser, E. (2023). A semantics of face emoji in discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-022-09369-8

8) Khoumssi, K. (2020). Functions of Code-switching in Young Moroccans’ Facebook Comments. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 5(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v5i1.382

9) Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The Metaphorical Structure of the Human Conceptual System. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0402_4

10) Maulidiya, R., Wijaya, S. E., mauren, C., Adha, T. P., & Pandin, M. G. R. (2021). Language Development of Slang In The Younger Generation In The Digital Era. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/xs7kd

11) Oh, J., & Kim, G. J. (2019). The Effect of Onomatopoeia to Enhancing User Experience in Virtual Reality. Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. Multimodal Interaction, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21607-8_11

12) Pianzola, F., Rebora, S., & Lauer, G. (2020). Wattpad as a resource for literary studies. Quantitative and qualitative examples of the importance of digital social reading and readers’ comments in the margins. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0226708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226708

13) Pulma, J. (2012, June 27). Exploring Culture: Dissecting Kilig. The GUIDON. https://theguidon.com/2012/06/exploring-culture-dissecting-kilig/

14) Rappler. (2016, April 14). “Kilig” is now a part of the Oxford English Dictionary. RAPPLER. https://www.rappler.com/life-and-style/arts-culture/129525-kilig-meaning-oxford-englishdictionary/

15) Rebora, S., & Pianzola, F. (2018). A New Research Programme for Reading Research: Analysing Comments in the Margins on Wattpad. DigitCult - Scientific Journal on Digital Cultures, 3(2), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.4399/97888255181532

16) Schlegel, C., Smith, C., Abe, K., & Kneebone, R. (2021). Onomatopoeia - listening to the sounds behind the words. 38(7), Doc123–Doc123. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001519

17) Sharifian, F. (2016). Cultural Linguistics. Etnolingwistyka. Problemy Języka I Kultury, 28, 31. https://doi.org/10.17951/et.2016.28.31

18) Tazijan, F., Bakar, R. A., Mohamed, R., & Ramli, N. F. M. (2021, December 29). Reading Walls: Digital Social Readers. Www.atlantis-Press.com; Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211227.009

19) Tian, Y., Galery, T., Dulcinati, G., Molimpakis, E., & Sun, C. (2017). Facebook sentiment: Reactions and Emojis. Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w17-1102

20) Wales, M., Rarick, G., & Davis, H. (1963). Message Exaggeration by the Receiver. Journalism Quarterly, 40(3), 339–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769906304000309

21) Wolf, M. (2018). Reader, Come Home: The Reading Brain in a Digital World. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Reader%2C-Come-Home%3A-The-Reading-Brainin-a-Digital-Wolf/680204cb9d99aadb0c9265e54d038086f83d3645