Educational Robotics in Distance Education and The Role of The Teacher


1Maria Foti, 2Sofia Papadimitriou, 3Anthi Karatrantou
1Hellenic Open University, Education and Technologies in distance teaching and learning systems - Educational Sciences, Patra, Greece
2,3Hellenic Open University, Tutor-Counsellor, Education and Technologies in distance teaching and learning systems – Educational Sciences, Patra, Greece
DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijirme.2025.v4i1n02

Abstract

With the appearance of Distance Education (DE) methodologies and approaches in education, the field of teaching has changed radically. With the parallel development of technology, new paths and opportunities have been created to enrich education with new creative methods. This article examines the evolving landscape of Distance Educational Robotics (DER), with reference to the critical role of teachers in guiding and facilitating quality educational experiences. Through an extensive literature review, this study examines the benefits and challenges associated with integrating Educational Robotics into Distance Education. It briefly reviews the platforms and tools that facilitate the implementation of DER and explores various pedagogical strategies and instructional designs that educators can use to maximize the effectiveness of DER, considering the diverse learning needs and capabilities of students. It also emphasizes the importance of continuous professional development of teachers to improve their competence in remote pedagogic practices and the use of technology. In conclusion, the study illuminates the dynamic relationship between DE and Educational Robotics and the role that the teacher acquires by combining the two. Highlighting the roles and complexities of teachers' responsibilities, the article offers methods and suggestions that can guide and support their efforts to create organized and effective teaching.

Keywords:

Educational Robotics, Distance Education, Teacher's Role, School Education

References:


1) Alimisis, D. (2020). Emerging pedagogies in robotics education: towards a paradigm shift. In Inclusive Robotics for a Better Society: Selected Papers from INBOTS Conference 2018, 16-18 October, 2018, Pisa, Italy (pp. 123-130). Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-24074-5_22

2) Anastasiadis, P. (2020). School Distance Education in the era of the Corona Virus COVID-19: the example of Greece and the challenge of the transition to the "Open School of Investigative Learning, Collaborative Creativity and Social Solidarity". Open Education: the magazine for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology, 16(2), 20-48.https://doi.org/10.12681/jode.25506

3) Angel-Fernandez, JM, & Vincze, M. (2018). Towards a definition of educational robotics. In Austrian Robotics Workshop 2018 (Vol. 37).10.15203/3187-22-1-08

4) Arís, N., & Orcos, L. (2019). Educational robotics in the stage of secondary education: Empirical study on motivation and STEM skills. Education Sciences, 9(2), 73.doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020073

5) Barone, R. (2021). Robotics in education—Advantages, benefits & importance for kids. https://www.idtech.com/blog/educational-benefits-robotics

6) Benitti, FBV (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58 (3), 978-988. doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006

7) Bernard, RM, Abrami, PC, Borokhovski, E., Wade, CA, Tamim, RM, Surkes, MA, & Bethel, EC (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243-1289. 10.3102/0034654309333844

8) Bishop, P. A., Downes, J. M., Netcoh, S., Farber, K., DeMink-Carthew, J., Brown, T., & Mark, R. (2020). Teacher roles in personalized learning environments. The Elementary School Journal, 121(2), 311-336.

9) Bogdandy, B., Tamas, J., & Toth, Z. (2020). Digital transformation in education during COVID-19: A case study. In 2020 11th IEEE international conference on cognitive infocommunications (pp. 000173-000178). IEEE.

10) Choi, H., Crump, C., Duriez, C., Elmquist, A., Hager, G., Han, D., ... & Trinkle, J. (2021). On the use of simulation in robotics: Opportunities, challenges, and suggestions for moving forward. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(1).doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907856118

11) Clark, T., & Barbour, M. (Eds.). (2023). Online, blended, and distance education in schools: Building successful programs. Taylor & Francis.

12) Falloon, G. (2011). Making the Connection: Moore's Theory of Transactional Distance and Its Relevance to the Use of a Virtual Classroom in Postgraduate Online Teacher Education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 187–209.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782569

13) Garrison, DR, & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

14) Gasparetto, A., & Scalera, L. (2019). A brief history of industrial robotics in the 20th century. Advances in Historical Studies, 8(1), 24-35.10.4236/ahs.2019.81002

15) Gratani, F., Giannandrea, L., Renieri, A., & Annessi, M. (2021). Fostering students' problem-solving skills through educational robotics in primary school. In Education in & with Robotics to Foster 21st-Century Skills: Proceedings of EDUROBOTICS 2020 (pp. 3-14). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-77022-8_1

16) Gubenko, A., Kirsch, C., Smilek, JN, Lubart, T., & Houssemand, C. (2021). Educational robotics and robot creativity: an interdisciplinary dialogue. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 178.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.662030

17) Inepologlou, E., Atmatzidou, S., & Dimitriadis, S. (2021). Educational Robotics as a Means of Developing Students' Argumentative and Computational Thinking Skills. Conferences of the Hellenic Scientific Association of Information & Communication Technologies in Education, 334-341.

18) Kappou, A. (2020). Views of primary and secondary education teachers on the integration of educational robotics into the educational process.

19) Karemfyllaki, M., Karatrantou, A., & Panagiotakopoulos C. (2022). Educational Robotics & Children’s Attitudes Towards STEM. In E. Koleza, C. Panagiotakopoulos, & K. Skordoulis, Innovating STEM Education: Increased Engagement and Best Practices (pp. 151-160). Common Ground Research Network, University of Illinois Research Park. (Αρχείο ΑΚ04) https://books.google.gr/books?id=wXKJEAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=el#v=onepage&q&f=false

20) Karatrantou, A. & Panagiotakopoulos C. (2011). ‘Educational robotics and teaching introductory programming within an interdisciplinary framework’. In A. Jimoyiannis (ed.), Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education (pp. 195-208). DOI 0.1007/978-1-4614-1083-6_15, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011.

21) A Karatrantou, M Stergiopoulou, C Panagiotakopoulos (2022). Teaching about the persistence of vision and the sampling rate of the human eye using STEM methodology: An empirical study. International Journal of Educational Innovation 4 (5), 80-92.

22) Karatrantou, A., Giannoula, V., Panagiotakopoulos, C., & Nikolaou, G. (2023a). Educational Robotics Applications as Tools to Support the Social Interactions and Integration of Refugee Children in the Community of Schools of Primary Education. In M. Shelley, V. Akerson, & M. Unal (Eds.), Proceedings of IConSES 2023–International Conference on Social and Education Sciences (pp. 617-633), Las Vegas, NV, USA. ISTES Organization

23) Κaratrantou, A., Kalamatianou, M., & Panagiotakopoulos, C. (2023b). Children with Autism and Educational Robotics: Education and Development of Social and Cognitive Skills. In M. Shelley, V. Akerson, & M. Unal (Eds.), Proceedings of IConSES 2023– International Conference on Social and Education Sciences (pp. 634-651), Las Vegas, NV, USA. ISTES Organization.

24) Karvounis, L., & Anastasiadis, P. (2019). The Pedagogical Utilization of Interactive Teleconferencing and the Production of Educational Material for Distance Education on the New Role of the Teacher and Teaching Presence in Modern Learning Environments. International Conference on Open & Distance Education,10(3A), 120-132. doi.org/10.12681/icodl.2360

25) Liakopoulou, E., & Stavropoulou, E. (2021). Distance Education in the Greek school during the covid-19 period: concerns, difficulties and actions taken to address them. 1st International Online Education Conference From the 20th to the 21st century in 15 days, (1), 331-341.https://doi.org/10.12681/online-edu.3243

26) Lionarakis, A. (2005). Open and Distance Education and Learning Processes. In A. Lionarakis (Ed.), Pedagogical and Technological Applications (pp. 13-38). Patras: Hellenic Open University. ISBN: 960-538-583-X

27) Lionarakis, A. (2006). The theory of Distance Education and the complexity of its polymorphic dimension. In A. Lionarakis (Ed.), Open and Distance Education - Elements of Theory and Practice (pp. 7-41). Athens: Propompos.

28) López-Belmonte, J., Segura-Robles, A., Moreno-Guerrero, AJ, & Parra-González, ME (2021). Robotics in education: a scientific mapping of the literature in Web of Science.Electronics,10(3), 291.doi.org/10.3390/electronics10030291

29) Majchrzak, A., Markus, ML, & Wareham, J. (2016). Designing for digital transformation. MIS quarterly,40(2), 267-278.

30) Merve, K. (2019). A systematic literature review: Constructivism in multidisciplinary learning environments. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 4(1-2), 19-26. 10.17985/ijare.520666

31) Mohammed, SH, & Kinyó, L. (2020). The role of constructivism in the enhancement of social studies education. Journal of critical reviews, 7(7), 249-256. dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.41

32) Moore, MG (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22-38). Routledge.

33) Oliveira, KKDS, & de SOUZA, RA (2022). Digital transformation towards education 4.0. Informatics in Education, 21(2), 283-309.

34) Oliveira, DS, Garcia, LT, & Gonçalves, LM (2023). A Systematic Review on Continuing Education of Teachers for Educational Robotics. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 107(2), 24. 10.1007/s10846-022-01804-z

35) Palloff, RM, & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. John Wiley & Sons.

36) Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2022). Exploring preservice teachers' attitudes about the usage of educational robotics in preschool education. In Research Anthology on Computational Thinking, Programming, and Robotics in the Classroom (pp. 807-823). IGI Global. 10.4018/978-1-6684-2411-7.ch035

37) Pasalidou, X., Fahandidis, N., & Georgakopoulou, N. B. (2021). Educational Robotics and Covid-19: Educators' Views on Distance Learning Support with Augmented Reality. Conferences of the Hellenic Scientific Association of Information & Communication Technologies in Education, 49-57.

38) Piedade, J., Dorotea, N., Pedro, A., & Matos, JF (2020). On teaching programming fundamentals and computational thinking with educational robotics: A didactic experience with pre-service teachers. Education Sciences, 10(9), 214.https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090214

39) Sapounidis, T., & Alimisis, D. (2021). Educational robotics curricula: Current trends and shortcomings. In Education in & with Robotics to Foster 21st-Century Skills: Proceedings of EDUROBOTICS 2020 (pp. 127-138). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-030-77022-8_12

40) Sahlou, E. P., Koutsoumba, M. I., & Filippoussis, G. (2022). "The pedagogical dynamics of ICT and its contribution to the pedagogy of Distance Education". International Conference on Open & Distance Education, 11(5A), 52-67.https://doi.org/10.12681/icodl.3388

41) Shatunova, O., Anisimova, T., Sabirova, F., & Kalimullina, O. (2019). STEAM as an innovative educational technology. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(2), 131-144.

42) Silva, R., Martins, F., Cravino, J., Martins, P., Costa, C., & Lopes, JB (2023). Using Educational Robotics in Pre-Service Teacher Training: Orchestration between an Exploration Guide and Teacher Role. Education Sciences, 13(2), 210.

43) Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., & Zvacek, S. (2015). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (6th ed.). Information Age Publishing.

44) Spector, JM (2014). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Springer. 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_71

45) Talan, T. (2021). The effect of educational robotic applications on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 5(4), 512-526. doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.242

46) Toh, LPE, Causo, A., Tzuo, PW, Chen, IM, & Yeo, SH (2016). A review on the use of robots in education and young children. Journal of Educational Technology & Society,19(2), 148-163.https://hdl.handle.net/10356/83090

47) Tsagaris, A., Chatzikyrkou, M. & Simeli, I. (2019). Educational robotics. The pleasure of participation. Journal of Contemporary Education, Theory & Research 3 1, 31-36. doi:10.25656/01:19088

48) Tselegkaridis, S., & Sapounidis, T. (2022). Exploring the Features of Educational Robotics and STEM Research in Primary Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 12(5), 305.

49) Tzagkaraki, E., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). Exploring the Use of Educational Robotics in primary school and its possible place in the curricula. In Education in & with Robotics to Foster 21st-Century Skills: Proceedings of EDUROBOTICS 2020 (pp. 216-229). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-77022-8_19

50) Yudin, A., Vlasov, A., Salmina, M., & Shalashova, M. (2020). Evolution of educational robotics in supplementary education of children. In Robotics in Education: Current Research and Innovations 10 (pp. 336-343). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-26945-6_30

51) Filippidis, N. A. (2018). The attitudes of teachers towards robots and their use in education (Doctoral dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki).doi.org/10.26262/heal.auth.ir.299348

52) Veselovská, M., Kubincová, Z., & Mayerová, K. (2020). Comparison of LEGO WeDo 2.0 robotic models in two different grades of elementary school. In Robotics in Education: Current Research and Innovations 10 (pp. 59-64). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-030-26945-6_6

53) Vicente, FR, Zapatera Llinares, A., & Montes Sanchez, N. (2021). Curriculum analysis and design, implementation, and validation of a STEAM project through educational robotics in primary education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education,29(1), 160-174.https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22373

54) Woods, P. (2021). Strategies, commitment and identity; making and breaking the teacher role. In Routledge Library Editions: Education Mini-Set N Teachers & Teacher Education Research 13 vols (pp. Vol218-273). Routledge.

55) Zhong, B., & Xia, L. (2020). A systematic review on exploring the potential of educational robotics in mathematics education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 79-101.

56) Zygouris, F. & Mavroides, H. (2011). Communication between teacher and students in Distance Education. Case study in the Teacher Training Program of the KEE EN. AP Open Education: the journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology,7(1), 69-86.https://doi.org/10.12681/jode.9769