Abstract

This study investigates how innovative learning tools affect student learning quality. The study aimed to evaluate how effective innovative learning tools are in enhancing learning quality, such as understanding material, student engagement, and achievement of learning goals. This research greatly impacts the education sector by presenting innovative approaches to using educational resources. The study took place at a secondary school. The study included 28 tenth-grade students from the experimental class as participants. This study employed a pre-test and post-test design to evaluate the difference in learning outcomes before and after the implementation of new media. The reason for selecting the experimental method was its ability to control variables impacting study outcomes and uncover the cause-and-effect connection between utilizing innovative learning media during the learning procedure. The study discovered that students who utilized creative media for learning showed higher levels of engagement compared to those who stuck to traditional learning methods. Using creative forms of media in education can enhance student involvement, bolster comprehension, and boost retention of material. Pre-assessment and post-assessment results revealed a notable growth in student participation. This research indicates that utilizing creative forms of media is an effective strategy for enhancing the quality of education. The research can offer recommendations to policymakers and educational professionals to improve curriculum development and teaching approaches that better meet the needs of modern students.

Keywords:

Innovative; Learning; Media; Quality

References:

1) Arif Akcay, & Burcu Karabulut Coskun. (2023). Examining the prediction of digital game addiction awareness on digital educational game usage. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 8(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1098602

2) Brown, A.E., and Smith, H.R. (2017). Microbiological Applications. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill Education.

3) Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.

4) Chen, H., King, F.J., Zhou, B. (2024). Drug target prediction through deep learning functional representation of gene signatures. Nat Commun 15, 1853 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46089-y

5) Chen, O., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2023). A Cognitive load theory approach to defining and measuring task complexity through element interactivity. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 1 – 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09782-w

6) El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students' engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1 – 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4

7) Garcia, A., Smith, B., & Chen, C. (2023). The impact of digital game-based learning on student creativity and motivation: a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 213-230.

8) Gardner, R.J.M. and Amor, D.J. (2018) Gardner and Sutherland's Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling. 5th Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199329007.001.0001

9) Ghani, M. T. A., & Daud, W. A. A. W. (2023). The Impact of Digital Game-Based Learning Towards Arabic Language Communication. Journal of Communication: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(1), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2023-3901-23

10) Harland, T. (2016). Teaching to enhance research. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(3), 461-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1107876

11) Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Vol. 2, pp. 215-239). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

12) Johnson, K., Pasquale, F., & Chapman, J. (2019) Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Bias in Finance: Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Bias in Finance: Toward Responsible Innovation Toward Responsible Innovation Recommended Citation Recommended Citation. In Fordham Law Review (Vol. 88). https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/big-data-tool-inclusion-or-exclusion-

13) Kim, J. Y., Lee, J. S., Lee, J. H., Park, Y. S., Cho, J., & Koh, J. C. (2023). Virtual reality simulator's effectiveness on the spine procedure education for trainees: a randomized controlled trial. Korean journal of anesthesiology, 76(3), 213-226. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.22491

14) Lee, S.-Y., Lo, Y.-H. G., & Chin, T.-C. (2021). Practicing multiliteracies to enhance EFL learners' meaning making process and language development: a multimodal problem-based approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(2), 66-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1614959

15) Leem, B. H. (2023). Impact of interactivity on learning outcomes in online learning settings: Ordinal logit model. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790231203107

16) Li, K., Wijaya, T. T., Chen, X., & Harahap, M. S. (2024). Exploring the factors affecting elementary mathematics teachers' innovative behavior: an integration of social cognitive theory. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52604-4

17) Liu, H., Li, C., Li, Y., & Lee, Y. J. (2023). Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning. http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.03744

18) Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. J Exp Psychol Appl; ISSN:1076-898X; 11(4). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16393035

19) Mayer, Richard E. (2009). Multimedia Learning. New York: Student Library. Cambridge University Press.

20) Meyer, K. E., Li, J., Brouthers, K. D., & Jean, R. J. Bryan. (2023). International business in the digital age: Global strategies in a world of national institutions. In Journal of International Business Studies (Vol. 54, Issue 4, pp. 577-598). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-023-00618-x

21) Meisuri, M., Zuliana, Z., Jahara, J., Mardikawati, B., & Wahyuni, E. (2023). Utilization of video-based learning media using the canva application. At-Tasyrih: Journal of Education and Islamic Law, 9(2), 398-412. https://doi.org/10.55849/attasyrih.v9i2.224

22) Petersen, G. B., Stenberdt, V., Mayer, R. E., & Makransky, G. (2023). Collaborative generative learning activities in immersive virtual reality increase learning. Computers and Education, 207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104931

23) Putri, E. N., Asrin, A., & Nurmawanti, I. (2023). Loaded coin media to improve understanding of the concept of counting operations of whole numbers in elementary school students. Journal of Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(4), 2022-2027. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i4.5973

24) Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers and Education, 58(1), 136-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017

25) Santoso, A. D., Andriani, R. D., Suciamahrani, M., Rukiyanto, B. A., & Bangun, E. U. P. B. (2023). Analysis of the implications of digital education curriculum development on learning achievement and student experience. Journal of Cahaya Mandalika, 3(2), 1749-1755. https://doi.org/10.36312/jcm.v3i2.2247

26) Xiaoquan Pan. (2020). Technology acceptance, technological self-efficacy, and attitude toward technology-based self-directed learning: learning motivation as a mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294

27) Zhao, H., Hills, G. E., & Seibert, S. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265-1272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1265