Abstract
The aim of this study is to analyse the dynamic relationship between economic growth and unemployment in Morocco. By examining the validity and asymmetry of Okun's law. Based on quarterly data covering the period from 2000 to 2022, we adopt a dynamic modelling of Okun's law, with the aim of estimating its elasticities during recessions and expansions using an ARDL model. The results of the study show the existence of an inverse relationship between GDP and unemployment with a strong persistence of the unemployment rate. The asymmetry study showed that unemployment reacts more strongly to negative deviations in real GDP than to positive deviations. In terms of policy implications, the study recommends the need to reform the structure of the Moroccan economy so as to allow the integration of a greater number of workers, while stimulating economic growth through the promotion of labour-intensive investment. Involving the Moroccan economy in a process of structural transformation is a crucial element, and investment in areas such as innovation, R&D or digital technology can help to increase real gross domestic product and consequently reduce the unemployment rate.
KEYWORDS:
Economic growth, Unemployment, Okun's Law, ARDL
References:
1) Ahmed, H., & Awadalbari, A. (2014). Economic Growth and Unemployment in Sudan: An Empirical Analysis. University of Bakht Alruda Scientific Journal(13).2) Beaton, K. (2010). Time variation in Okun's law: A Canada and US comparison. Bank of Canada, Working Paper, 7, 3-15. C., H. H., & Chang Y.K. (2005). Investigating Okun’s law by the structural break with thresholdapproach: evidence from Canada. The Manchester School, 73, 5, 599-611.
3) Christopoulos, D. K. (2004). The relationship between output and unemployment: Evidence from Greek regions. . Papers in Regional Science, 83 (3), , 611–620.
4) E, W. C. (1995). Cyclical output, cyclical unemployment, and okun’s coefficient : A new approach. Journal of applied econometrics 10 (4), 433–445.
5) El Faiz., Z., & Tounsi., S. (March, 2019). Les fluctuations cycliques de la production et du chômage au Maroc : une approche sectorielle de la loi d’Okun. The ERF 25th Annual Conference. Kuwait.
6) Ezzahid, E., & El Alaoui, A. (2014). Economic growth and jobs creation in morocco : Overall and sectors’ analysis.
7) Fouquau, J. (2008). Threshold effects in Okun’s Law: a panel data analysis. . Economics Bulletin, 5, 33,, 114.
8) Freeman, D. (2001). Panel tests of Okun's law for ten industrial countries. . Economic Inquiry, 39,, 511-523.
9) Gabrisch, H., & Buscher , H. (2006). The relationship between unemployment and output in post-communist countries. Post-communist economies, 18 (3), 261–276.
10) Gordon, R. (1984). Unemployment and Potential Output in the 1980s. . Brookings Paper on Economic Activity, 2, , 537-586.
11) Hamanda, K., & Kurosaka, Y. (1984). The relationship between production and unemployment in Japan: Okun's law in a comparative perspective. European Economic Review, 5,, 71-105.
12) Harris, R., & Silverstone, B. (2001). Testing for asymmetry in okun’s law : A cross-country comparison. Economics Bulletin 5 (2), 1–13.
13) HCP, & Banque Mondiale. (Novembre 2017.). Le marché du travail au Maroc: Défis et opportunités.
14) Hodrick, R. J., & Prescott, E. C. (1997.). Postwar us business cycles : an empirical investigation. Journal of Money, credit, and Banking, 1–16.
15) Huang, H. C., & Lin, S. C. (2006). A flexible nonlinear inference to Okun’s relationship. Applied Economics Letters, 13 (5), 325–331.
16) Huang, H., & Lin, S. (2008). Smooth-Time-Variyng Okun's Coeffcient. Economic Modelling.
17) Jardin, M. &. (2010). How Okun’s law is non-linear in Europe: A semi-parametric approach. Rennes, University of Rennes.
18) Knotek, E. S. (2007). How Useful is Okun’s Law? Federal Reser EDERAL RESERVE BANK OF KANSAS CITY.
19) Lee, J. (2000). The robustness of okun’s law : Evidence from oecd countries. . Journal of macroeconomics 22 (2). Mandri, B., El Abbassi, I., & Moussir, C. E. (2018). Un regard sur la relation d’okun au maroc : analyse désagrégée de la croissance. Dans K. E. Aynaoui, Les enjeux du marché du travail au Maroc. OCP Policy Center.
20) Mankiw, N. G. (2003). Macroéconomie. 5ème éd. De Boeck, Bruxelles.
21) Moosa, I. (1997). A cross-country comparison of Okun's coefficient. Comparative Economics 24, 335-356.
22) Moosa, I. (2008). Economic growth and unemployment in arab countries : Is okun’s law valid ? Journal of Development and Economic Policies 10 (2),, 7–24.
23) Moosa, I. A. (1999). Cyclical output, cyclical unemployment and Okun’s coefficient: Structural time series approach. International Review of Economics and Finance, 8, 293-304.
24) Okun, A. (1962). Potential gnp : its measurement and significance. . In : Proceedings of the Business and Economic.
25) Perman, R., & Tavera, C. (2005). A cross-country analysis of the Okun’s Law coefficient convergence in Europe. Applied Economics, 37 (21), 2501–2513.
26) Prachowny, M. (1993). Okun's Law: Theoretical Foundations and Revisited Estimates. The Review of Economics and Statistics, XXX, 331-336.
27) Sboui., Nouira, & Gouider. (2018). La relation croissance-chômage en Tunisie : validation de la spécification non linéaire de la loi d’Okun. Région et Développement, 47.
28) Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt, Springer, 281–314.
29) Silvapulle, P., Moosa, I. A. , & Silvapulle, M. J. (2004). Asymmetry in okun’s law. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique 37 (2), 353–374.
30) Sögner, L., & Stiassny, A. (2002). An analysis on the structural stability of Okun’s law–a cross-country study. Applied Economics, 34 (14), 1775–1787.
31) Soudi, K., & Ziroili, M. (anvier - Février 2018.). Croissance, in´égalité et emploi. Dans Les Cahiers du Plan (50).
32) Vougas, D. V. (2003). Unemployment in Greece. . Journal of Policy Modeling, 25 (2),, 107–112. Weber, C. E. (1995). Cyclical output, cyclical unemployment, and okun’s coefficient : A new approach. Journal of applied econometrics 10 (4), 433–445.