Abstract

This study explores literacy competence (LC) in elementary schools, emphasizing its importance while revealing its current deficiencies. The primary goal is to examine LC through the lens of the Guided Reading (GR) Model and its sociocultural influences. Using an Explanatory Sequential design as part of a mixed-method approach, the research included 200 fourth-grade students from six elementary schools, comprising 94 males and 106 females. Research tools such as pre-tests and post-tests, observations, questionnaires, and in-depth interviews with students, parents, and teachers were utilized. Data analysis was conducted using the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test. The study's findings reveal that the GR model effectively elevates LC from a low to medium level. Literacy comprehension advanced from a factual literal understanding to an interpretive one. However, sociocultural elements, such as book reading facilities, parental guidance, and technology use, were found to affect LC, with inappropriate technology usage having a negative impact. This research underscores the importance of meaningful teacher guidance via the GR model in developing literacy skills, emphasizing the significant role sociocultural factors play. Further investigation into the effects of technology on learning and other sociocultural factors not covered in this study is crucial.

KEYWORDS:

Literacy competence, guided reading model, sociocultural influence, Mixed method res

References:

1) Anwar, I. W., & Wahid, J. H. (2021). Learners' perception on online learning implementation during covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 9(2), 126-138.

2) Aziz, A. A., Yusof, K. M., & Yatim, J. M. (2012). Evaluation on the effectiveness of learning outcomes from students’ perspectives. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 22-30.

3) Bueno, D. C. (2019). Research and publish or hibernate? analysis of the limiting factors towards scientific productivity among professorial lecturers in the Philippines. The Journal: A Multidisciplinary Research Review, 14, 1-13.

4) Dooley, K. E., Linder, J. R., & Dooley, L. M. (2005). Writing instructional objectives. In Advanced methods in distance education: Applications and practices for educators, administrators and learners (pp. 118-131). IGI Global.

5) Gaikwad, P. (2021). Balancing research productivity and teaching by faculty in higher education: A case study in the Philippines. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(7), 181-192.

6) Gul, R., Kanwal, S., & Khan, S. S. (2020). Preferences of the teachers in employing revised blooms taxonomy in their instructions. sjesr, 3(2), 258-266.

7) Rosario, L. M., Paduano, J., Magangan, D. M., Motos, S. M., Grampil, E., Cacho, R. J., ... & Navigar, N. (2022). Formulation of Research Productivity Score for Philippine Higher Education Institutions. In 29th Annual Conference Philippine Society for Educational Research and Evaluation Inc.

8) Tekir, S., & Akar, H. (2019). The current state of instructional materials education: Aligning policy, standards, and teacher education curriculum. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 19.