1. Home
  2. Volume 03 Issue 04 April 2024
  3. April 2024

April 2024

The Role of Technology Use in Moderating the Influence of Social Capital and Work Environment on Teacher Performance

1Haeruman Ismail Hamdani, 2Putu Yudy Wijaya, 3Made Dian Putri Agustina
1Master of Management Study Program, Faculty of Business Economics and Tourism, Indonesian Hindu University, Denpasar
2,3Lecture of Management Study Program, Faculty of Business Economics and Tourism, Indonesian Hindu University, Denpasar
DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijirme.2024.v3i4n03

Abstract

Many things are indicated as the driving force in improving performance, and the success of a graduate at the high school level cannot be separated from an educator (teacher). So this research aims to determine the moderating influence of the use of technology in encouraging performance between social capital and the work environment on teacher performance. This research uses a quantitative descriptive approach with primary and secondary data sources. The research population was all teachers in high schools in Sekotong sub-district, West Lombok, namely 91 teachers. Determination of samples using purposive sampling so that 91 teacher informants were obtained. The research instrument used a questionnaire distributed using Google Form. Data analysis method using path analysis and with SmartPLS 4.0 as a processing tool. The results of this research are that social capital is proven to have no significant effect on teacher performance, meaning that a wide and dense network of relationships does not have an effect on increasing teacher performance for high school/vocational school level teachers in Cendi Manik Village, Sekotong District, West Lombok Regency, West Nusa Tenggara. Meanwhile, the work environment has been proven to have a significant positive effect on teacher performance. This means that the better the work environment, the better the teacher performance will be at the High School teachers in Cendi Manik Village, Sekotong District, West Lombok Regency, West Nusa Tenggara. Then technology is not proven to moderate social capital and the work environment on teacher performance. This means that technology must be balanced with other things to support it, for example balancing knowledge with training and updating knowledge.

Keywords:

Social Capital, Work Environment, Use of Technology and Teacher Performance

References:

1) Ahmad, Y., Tewal, B., & Taroreh, R. N. (2019). The Influence of Work Stress, Workload, and Work Environment on Employee Performance at Pt. Fif Group Manado.EMBA Journal: Journal of Economic, Management, Civil Service and Accounting Research, 7(3).

2) Alhadabi, A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2020). Grit, self-efficacy, achievement orientation goals, and academic performance in University students. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 519-535.

3) Abdullah, A. (2020). Relationship the Work Culture and Training Programs Within Performance. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT), 20(1), 92-101.

4) Ali, H. (2022). Literature Review the Effect of Division of Work and Workload on Work Effectiveness and its Impact on Employee Performance. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 3(2), 227-240.

5) Andriani, S., Kesumawati, N., & Kristiawan, M. (2018). The influence of the transformational leadership and work motivation on teachers performance. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(7), 19-29.

6) Andriani, S., Kesumawati, N., & Kristiawan, M. (2018). The influence of the transformational leadership and work motivation on teachers performance. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(7), 19-29.

7) Blömeke, S., Houang, R., Hsieh, F. J., & Wang, T. Y. (2017). Effects of job motives, teacher knowledge and school context on beginning teachers’ commitment to stay in the profession: A longitudinal study in Germany, Taiwan and the United States. In G. K. LeTendre & M. Akiba (Eds.), International handbook of teacher quality and policy (pp. 374–387). London: Routledge.

8) Cahyono, A. E., Herawati, Y. W., Anshory, A., & Muntaqim, A. (2022). Online teaching by digital native and digital immigrant lecturers of higher education. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 4(36), 1-14.

9) Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social–emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1189.

10) Dunaetz, D. R. (2022). When Technology Does More Harm than Good: Technostress in Missionary Contexts. Dunaetz, DR (2022) When technology does more harm than good: Technostress in missionary contexts. Journal of the Evangelical Missiological Society, 2(1), 112-128.

11) Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.

12) Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572-2593.

13) Hale, T., Angrist, N., Goldszmidt, R., Kira, B., Petherick, A., Phillips, T., ... & Tatlow, H. (2021). A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker). Nature human behaviour, 5(4), 529-538.

14) Hancock, P. A., & Matthews, G. (2019). Workload and performance: Associations, insensitivities, and dissociations. Human factors, 61(3), 374-392.

15) Hughes, K. 2014. Work/place’ Media. Media, Culture & Society 36 (5): 644–660.

16) Hayat, A. A., Shateri, K., Amini, M., & Shokrpour, N. (2020). Relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning-related emotions, and metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students: a structural equation model. BMC medical education, 20(1), 1-11.

17) Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis 6th Edition.

18) Hermawan, E., Komala, M., & Yohana, C. (2020). THE IMPACT OF WORK LOAD AND WORK STRESS ON EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS MOBILE SAKTI COMPANY. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(6), 5787-5802.

19) Heidari, A., Navimipour, N. J., & Unal, M. (2022). Applications of ML/DL in the management of smart cities and societies based on new trends in information technologies: A systematic literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 104089.

20) Ingersoll, R., Merrill, L., & May, H. (2014). What are the effects of teacher education and preparation on beginning teacher attrition?. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.

21) Ingersoll, R. (2017). Misdiagnosing America’s teacher quality problem. In G. K. LeTendre & M. Akiba (Eds.), International handbook of teacher quality and policy (pp. 79–96). London: Routledge.

22) Jaiswal, A., Sengupta, S., Panda, M., Heart, L., Prikshat, V., Patel, P. and Mohyuddin, S. (2022). Teleworking: role of psychological well-being and technostress in the relationship between trust in management and employee performance, International Journal of Manpower, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-04-2022-0149

23) Johnson, S. M., Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1–39.

24) Kuchai, O., Skyba, K., Demchenko, A., Savchenko, N., Necheporuk, Y., & Rezvan, O. (2022). The Importance of Multimedia Education in the Informatization of Society. IJCSNS, 797.

25) Kraft, M. A., Marinell, W. H., & Shen-Wei Yee, D. (2016). School organizational contexts, teacher turnover, and student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Educational Research Journal, 53(5), 1411–1449.

26) Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805.

27) Lundahl, L. (2016). Equality, inclusion and marketization of Nordic education: Introductory notes. Research in Comparative and International Education, 11(1), 3–12.

28) Ljungholm, D. P. (2018). Employee-employer relationships in the gig economy: Harmonizing and consolidating labor regulations and safety nets. contemp. Readings L. & Soc. Just., 10, 144.

29) Latan and Ghozali, I.,, H. 2019.Partial Least Square Concepts, Techniques and Applications Using the Smart PLs 3.0 Program. Semarang: Diponegoro University Semarang.

30) Lindqvist, P., Nordänger, U. K., & Carlsson, R. (2014). Teacher attrition the first five years–A multifaceted image. Teaching and Teacher Education, 40, 94–103.

31) Lacerenza, C. N., Marlow, S. L., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Salas, E. (2018). Team development interventions: Evidence-based approaches for improving teamwork. American psychologist, 73(4), 517.

32) Liang, G., & Akiba, M. (2017). Teachers’ working conditions: A cross-national analysis using the OECD TALIS and PISA data. In G. K. LeTendre & M. Akiba (Eds.), International handbook of teacher quality and policy (pp. 388–402). London: Routledge

33) Lukito, L. H., & Alriani, I. M. (2019). The influence of workload, work environment, work stress on employee performance at PT. Sinarmas distribution archipelago Semarang.Journal of Management Accounting Economics, 25(45).

34) Mallaboyev, N. M., Sharifjanovna, Q. M., & Nodirbek, M. (2022, May). INTERACTION BETWEEN INFORMATION COMPLEXES IN ECONOMIC SPHERES. In Conference Zone (pp. 250-253).

35) Mishra, S. (2020). Social networks, social capital, social support and academic success in higher education: A systematic review with a special focus on ‘underrepresented’students. Educational Research Review, 29, 100307.

36) Markova, O., Semerikov, S., Striuk, A., Shalatska, H., Nechypurenko, P., & Tron, V. (2019). Implementation of cloud service models in training of future information technology specialists.

37) Nabawi, R. (2020). The influence of the work environment, job satisfaction and workload on employee performance.Maneggio: Master of Management Scientific Journal, 2(2), 170-183.

38) Nugroho, W., & Surono, A. (2018). Reconstruction of Development Law in Environmental and Natural Resources Regulatory Policy.Indonesian Environmental Law Journal, 4(2), 77-110.

39) Norawati, S., Zulher, Z., Yunita, A., & Ilyas, I. (2022). Analysis of Compensation and Workload and Its Impact on the Performance of Medical Employees at Bangkinang Regional Hospital.Journal of Employee and Management Applications (JABM), 8(2), 553-553.

40) Obamiro, J. K., & Kumolu-Johnson, B. O. (2019). Work environment and employees’ performance: Empirical evidence of Nigerian Beverage Firm. Journal of the Danube University. Economic, 15(3).

41) Park, S., Choi, G. J., & Ko, H. (2020). Information technology–based tracing strategy in response to COVID-19 in South Korea—privacy controversies. People, 323(21), 2129-2130.

42) Putra, A. A., & Laily, N. (2019). The Influence of Workload, Work Environment and Motivation on Employee Performance at PT Para Bathara Surya.Journal of Management Science and Research (JIRM), 8(9).

43) Putri, T. T., Sitepu, I. Y., Sihombing, M., & Silvi, S. (2019). Analysis and detection of hoax contents in indonesian news based on machine learning. Journal of Informatics Pelita Nusantara, 4(1).

44) Rawas, S., Zekri, A., & El-Zaart, A. (2022). LECC: Location, energy, carbon and cost-aware VM placement model in geo-distributed DCs. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 33, 100649.

45) Ronfeldt, M., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36.

46) Saputra, R. W., & Hayaty, R. (2022). The Effect of Discipline and Workload on Employee Performance with Motivation Mediation on Administrative Bureau Employees Leading of the Regional Secretariat of South Kalimantan Province. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(6), 1077-1100.

47) Setini, M., Yasa, N. N. K., Supartha, I. W. G., Giantari, I. G. A. K., & Rajiani, I. (2020). The passway of women entrepreneurship: Starting from social capital with open innovation, through to knowledge sharing and innovative performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 25.

48) Sapta, I. K. S., Landra, N., Supartha, I. W. G., Asih, D., & Setini, M. (2020). Public health welfare in digital-based resources transformation from social capital and information sharing: Creative industries from village. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(6), 688-696.

49) Setini, M., Yasa, N. N. K. Y., Supartha, I., & Giantari, I. G. A. K. (2021). The effects of knowledge sharing, social capital and innovation on marketing performance. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 5(3), 257-266.

50) Wang, Z. (2022). Aesthetic evaluation of multidimensional graphic design based on voice perception model and internet of things. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 13(3), 1485-1496.