Abstract

Environmental management is the management of activities that may have an impact on the environment. It aims to limit polluting emissions and risks to the environment and to save natural resources. Often unsuspected and therefore without us always realizing it, all economic activities can have a considerable impact on the environment. Indeed, the manufacture of products requires the extraction of raw materials and the use of water and energy. Similarly, activities associated with the manufacturing process, such as maintenance, transportation; all have environmental impacts. The environmental management system is a progress tool that integrates the environmental dimension into an organization’s strategy, leading it to set objectives, achieve and maintain performance through effective management and promotes anticipation (the forecast). There is a multitude of guides allowing self-diagnosis by the organization and which make it possible to make an environmental assessment. ISO 14001 is the environmental management standard (EMS) created by the international organization for standardization. It defines the requirements of a global environmental management system for self-reporting or certification purposes. It is organized in 17 points modeled on quality management, well known for 34 years in the industry. The standard does not establish any absolute requirement for environmental performance, other than a commitment to environmental policy, to comply with legislation and the principle of continuous improvement. Pollution prevention through the identification of the various significant environmental aspects and impacts, which accounted for 70% of the requirements of ISO 14001, is the main environmental improvement point. In addition, since these environmental aspects and impacts can only be identified from the activities, products and services associated with them, this article represents a working method that allows expressing good environmental practices, present in the form of environmental performance indicators that inform in a concentrated and precise manner on the different activities with environmental relevance.

Keywords:

ISO 14001, Environmental impact, Pollution, Environmental aspect, EMS.

References:

1) F.Testa. EMAS and ISO 14001: the differences in effectively improving environmental performance.Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 68, 1 April 2014, Pages 165-173 ;

2) W.R.Q Anton. Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. (2004) ;

3) P. Barla. ISO 14001certification and environmental performance in Quebec’s pulp and paper industry. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. (2007) ;

4) O. Boiral et al. Modelling the impact of ISO 14001 on environmental performance: a comparative approach. J. Environ. Manag. (2012) ;

5) C. Comoglio et al. The use of indicators and the role of environmental management systems for environmental performances improvement: a survey on ISO 14001 certified companies in the automotive sector. J. Clean. Prod. (2012) ;

6) F. Iraldo and al. Is an environmental management system able to influence environmental and competitive performance ? The case of the eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) in the European Union. Journal of Cleaner Production. (2009)

7) Sophia Su, Kevin Baird and Thanh Phan. The association between ethical leadership and environmental activity management: The mediating role of employee environmental empowerment. Advances in Accounting. August 2023;

8) M. Franchetti. ISO 14001 and solid waste generation rates in US manufacturing organizations: an analysis of relationship. J. Clean. Prod. (2011) ;

9) Aoxiang Zhang, Rongrong Deng and Yunfeng Wu. Does the green credit policy reduce the carbon emission intensity of heavily polluting industries? -Evidence from China's industrial sectors. Journal of Environmental Management. Volume 311, 1 June 2022;

10) Julian Clifton, Eslam O. Osman, David J. Suggett and David J. Smith. Resolving conservation and development tensions in a small island state: A governance analysis of Curieuse Marine National Park, Seychelles. Marine Policy. Volume 127, May 2021;

11) Lorenzo Rinaldi, Matteo Vincenzo Rocco, Emanuela Colombo. Assessing critical materials demand in global energy transition scenarios based on the Dynamic Extraction and Recycling Input-Output framework (DYNERIO). Resources, Conservation and Recycling. Volume 191, April 2023;

12) Uğur Karadurmuş and Levent Bilgili. Environmental impacts of synthetic fishing nets from manufacturing to disposal: A case study of Türkiye in life cycle perspective. Marine Pollution Bulletin. Volume 198, January 2024;

13) Jesus Valero-Gil a, Jordi A. Surroca b, Josep A. Tribo c, Leopoldo Gutierrez d, Ivan Montiel. Innovation vs. standardization: The conjoint effects of eco-innovation and environmental management systems on environmental performance. Research Policy. Volume 52, Issue 4, May 2023;

14) Hsin-Ju Lin and Hwong-wen Ma. Analysis of green certification standards related to recycled materials involving textiles based on life cycle thinking. Sustainable Production and Consumption Volume 41, October 2023;

15) Joel A. Tickner and Ken Geiser. The precautionary principle stimulus for solutions- and lternatives-based environmental policy. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Volume 24, Issues 7–8, October–November 2004;

16) Martí Casadesús, Frederic Marimon, Iñaki Heras. ISO 14001 diffusion after the success of the ISO 9001 model. Journal of Cleaner Production. Volume 16, Issue 16, November 2008;

17) Ahm Shamsuzzoha, Anna-Miia Suihkonen, Camilla Wahlberg, Bojan Jovanovski and Sujan Piya. Development of value proposition to promote green innovation for sustainable organizational development. Cleaner Engineering and Technology. Volume 15, August 2023;

18) Henri Jalo and Henri Pirkkalainen. Effect of user resistance on the organizational adoption of extended reality technologies: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Information Management. Volume 75, April 2024;

19) N.M. Gusmerotti and al. The role of negotiating tools in the environmental policy mix instruments: determinants and effects of environmental agreements. J. Clean. Prod. (2012) ;

20) K. Segerson and al. Voluntary environmental agreements: good or bad news for environmental protection? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. (1998).