Abstract

The purpose of this phenomenological study was to elicit teachers' lived experiences of teaching Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) in the primary grades. It sought to evaluate the MTB-MLE program in Dawis Elementary School in Digos City, Philippines particularly in its effects in the curriculum, instruction, and assessment, the effect of the transition from mother tongue to English language, and how teachers address the challenges they encountered in the implementation of MTB-MLE. In-depth interview (IDI) was conducted to the participants who handled learners from diverse tribes. Eight (8) significant themes emerged from the effects of MTB-MLE in terms of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment divided into two categories: success and struggles. For the success: Easy Understanding of Concepts and Enhancement of Students’ Engagement surfaced as themes. For the struggles: Linguistic Problems, Transition Challenges, Construction of non-standardized test, Inadequate Instructional Materials, Teacher Training Difficulty, and No Codified Dialects cropped up. Four (4) significant themes emerged in the transition from Mother Tongue to English Language to the learners: lexical problems, lack of instructional materials, translation difficulties, and comprehension difficulties. Five (5) themes in terms of the strategies that teachers address during the transition from Mother Tongue to English language appeared: Translation of target language to mother tongue, Utilization of Multilingual Resources, Utilization of technological aids, Use of scaffolding and bridging in instruction, and enhancing and optimizing the learning experience of students. The study's findings shed light for evaluating the MTB-MLE curriculum. School administrators may find this study to be helpful in providing insights for enhancing the MTB-MLE curriculum. Likewise, results of the study may provide incisive contributions to the ongoing discourse on MTB-MLE.

Keywords:

Climate Change, Figure of Speech, Persuasive Language, Environmental Speech

References:

1) Baba, J. (2019). Teachers want mother tongue-based subjects as separate subjects. SunStar Davao.

2) Baquiller, Gemarie & Abellon, Jr. (2021). TEACHERS’ PROBLEMS IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS USING MOTHER TONGUE IN A DISTRICT OF THE PHILIPPINES. 431-437. 10.17501/24246700.2021.7143.

3) Basel, R. (2017). How to Conduct a Focus Group Discussion (FGD): Methodological Manual.

4) Bautista, M. L. S. (2015). The implementation of mother tongue-based multilingual education in the Philippines: Prospects and challenges. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 35 (3), 311-321. doi: 10.1080/02188791.2015.1037103

5) Besinga, M. E. (2019). Translation of Target Language to Mother tongue: Strategy Employed by Teachers in Implementing Mother tongue-Based instruction in A Multilingual Classroom Setting. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, 3(2K).

6) Bhandari, P. (2023). Ethical Considerations in Research | Types & Examples. Scribbr.

7) Burton, L. A. (2013). Mother tongue-based multilingual education in the Philippines: Studying top-down policy implementation from the bottom up (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota).

8) Caberte, J., & Balce, N. (2016). Mother tongue-based multilingual education (MTB-MLE) in the Philippines: The impact of teacher training on classroom practices. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36 (4), 500- 511. doi: 10.1080/02188791.2015.1124489

9) Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48-71). Oxford University Press.

10) Cruz, I. (2019) Teachers urge DepEd to address flaws in mother tongue-based education. Rappler.

11) Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

12) Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

13) Dekker, D., Dizon, G., & Castro, L. (2008). Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education in the Philippines: Studying Top-Down Policy Implementation from the Bottom Up. Language Policy, 7(4), 359–380.

14) Dequińa, Mary Grace & Oliva, Elleine. (2022). SILENT CRIES: ATTITUDES AND PROBLEMS OF TEACHERS TEACHING MTB-MLE IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR). 178-184. 10.36713/epra9386.

15) DJ’s Research. (2022). Qualitative research design. DJ’s Research Ltd. Dutcher, N. (2004). The Benefits of Multilingual Education. Educational Leadership, 61(2), 51-54.

16) Eeuwijk, P., & Angehrn, Z. (2017). How to … Conduct a Focus Group Discussion (FGD): Methodological Manual. Basel: University of Basel.

17) Grageda, A. M. C., & Lumabi, L. G. C. (2019). Multilingualism in education: A study of mother tongue instruction in Philippine schools. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(6), 497-511. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2018.1539338

18) Hall, J. K. (2010). Practices of teachers in multilingual classrooms: An ecological perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 94(3), 385-400.

19) Hasko Wiley Online Library. (2012). Qualitative Corpus Analysis.

20) Hernandez, A. R., & Duguiang, W. R. (2019). Mother tongue-based multilingual education in the Philippines: Perceptions and challenges of kindergarten teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(5), 1135-1141. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2019.070506

21) Horwitz, E. K. (2008). Becoming a language teacher: A practical guide to second language learning and teaching (2nd ed.). Allyn and Bacon Hunahunan, L. (2019). Issues and challenges in teaching mother tongue-based multilingual education in grades ii and iii: The Philippine experience. International Journal for Social Studies, 6(7), 298-304.

22) Informed Consent. (2021). Research Support. University of Oxford.

23) Joshua, S. (2010). Use of instructional materials and the performance of secondary school students in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 1(2), 46-49.

24) Kosonen, K., & Hirotani, M. (2017). Language use and proficiency in mother tongue and Filipino of Philippine elementary school students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(1), 89-105. doi: 10.1080/02188791.2016.1257964

25) Lartec, J. K., Belisario A. M., Bendanillo, J. P., Binas-o, H. K., Bucang, N. O., & Cammagay, J. L. W. (2014). Strategies and Problems Encountered by Teachers in Implementing Mother Tongue – Based Instruction in a Multilingual Classroom. IAFOR Journal of Language Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.22492/ijll.1.1.04

26) Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

27) Malone, M. E. (2007). Bringing Literacy Home: An Evaluation of Every Child Ready to Read Program. Public Library Quarterly, 26 (3-4), 117-135.

28) Mayol, A. L. (2017). Why teachers prefer their mother tongue. Philippine Daily Inquirer.

29) Phindane, Pule. (2020). THE INFLUENCE OF MOTHER TONGUE IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING IN PRIMARY SCHOOL. 380-384. 10.36315/2020end081.

30) Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health.

31) Ramos, M. (2019, March 17). Teacher's group urges DepEd: Make MTB-MLE a separate subject. Manila Bulletin News.

32) Rivera, L. B., & Lipaopao, R. J. (2019). Implementation of mother tongue-based multilingual education (MTB-MLE) in indigenous communities in the Philippines. Journal of Language and Education, 5(1), 21-34. doi: 10.17323/jle.2019.8778

33) Rola, R. (2017). The politics of language and learning in the Philippines: Historical trajectories and contemporary challenges. In A. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes (pp. 470-484). Routledge.

34) Rawat, A. S. (2021). What is Descriptive Analysis? - Types and Advantages.

35) Analytics Steps.

36) Seid, Yared. (2018). The impact of learning first in mother tongue: evidence from a natural experiment in Ethiopia. Applied Economics. 51. 1-17. 10.1080/00036846.2018.1497852.

37) Setia, R. (2017). Conducting In-Depth Interviews: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth Interviews for Evaluation Input. PATH.

38) Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information, 22(2), 63-75.

39) Silent cries: Attitudes and problems of teachers teaching MTB-MLE in public schools: EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR) (no date) SILENT CRIES: ATTITUDES AND PROBLEMS OF TEACHERS TEACHING MTB-MLE IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS | EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR). Available at: https://eprajournals.com/IJMR/article/6488/abstract

40) Thorne, S. (2016). Interpretive description: Qualitative research for applied practice. Routledge.

41) Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry. (2015). Phenomenology as a research design: From whys and how's to the lived experience of the phenomenon.

42) UNESCO. (2018). Enhancing learning of children from diverse language backgrounds: Mother tongue-based bilingual or multilingual education in the early years (p. 41). UNESCO

43) University of Oxford. (2021). Ethical review of research involving human participants.

44) Wang, L., & Fang, F. (2020). Native-speakerism policy in English language teaching revisited: Chinese university teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards native and non-native English-speaking teachers. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2020.1778374

45) World Bank. (2016). Philippines - Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education: Impacts on Children's Learning.

46) Young, J. (2014). Encouragement in the Classroom: How Do I Help Students Stay Positive and Focused?. ASCD.