Abstract

The objective of this research is to examine the basis of the judge's considerations in deciding case number 2284K/Pdt/2021 and the Legal Protection of Parties Recorded in Ownership Certificates Revoked by the Judge. The research method employed is normative, utilizing a legislative and case approach. The judge's considerations to revoke Ownership Certificate Number 588 under the name of Slamet Siswosuharjo as the Defendant in Convention/Plaintiff in Reconviction, take into account the presented written evidence and testimonies of witnesses submitted by the Plaintiff in Convention/Defendant in Reconviction since they are interconnected. The judge also does not take into consideration the evidence of the Defendant's land ownership. Furthermore, legal protection for the parties listed in the ownership certificate revoked by the judge includes: The holders of land rights must be protected both repressively and preventively, in accordance with Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration, as stipulated in Article 32 paragraph 2 which asserts that they are the holders of land rights. The judge must determine who owns the property when a land certificate exists.

Keywords:

Certificate Cancellation, Legal Considerations, Legal Protection.

References:

1) Ali Achmad Chomzah (2004) “Hukum Agraria (Pertanahan di Indonesia)”. Jakarta , Prestasi Pustakarya.

2) Ariadi, D., & Saptono, A. (2017). Pembatalan Sertipikat Terhadap Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Oleh Hakim (Analisis Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kabupaten Ngawi No. 11/Pdt.G/2012/Pn.Ngw). Jurnal Repertorium Volume IV No. 2, 135-142.

3) Hadisiswati, Indri. (2000). Kepastian Hukum Dan Perlindungan Hukum Hak Atas Tanah, Ahkam, Volume 2, Nomor 1, Juli 2014.

4) Hanifah, Mardalena. (2016) “Kajian Yuridis: Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan.” Adhaper: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 2, No. 1

5) Harsono,Boedi (2005), Hukum Agraria Indonesia: Sejarah Pembentukan UndangUndang Pokok Agraria dan Pelaksanaannya. Jakarta , Djambatan

6) HS, S., & Nurbani, E. S. (2014). Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Tesis dan Desertasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

7) Mudjiono, (2007), Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan di Indonesia Melalui Revitalisasi Fungsi Badan Peradilan,Jurnal Hukum No. 3 Vol.14 Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

8) Mudjiono, (2007), Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan di Indonesia Melalui Revitalisasi Fungsi Badan Peradilan,Jurnal Hukum No. 3 Vol.14

9) Muhammad, A. (2004). Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

10) Saifuddin, S. S., & Qamariyanti, Y. (2022). Kepastian Hukum Sertifikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah atas Terbitnya Surat Keterangan Tanah pada Objek Tanah yang sama. Notary Law Journal Vol 1 Issue 1, 31-48.

11) Salfutra, Reko Dwi (2019), Hukum Agraria Indonesia. Yogyakarta, Thafa Media.

12) Soemitro, R. H. (2000). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

13) Sutedi, A. (2006). Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

14) R. Soeprapto, (1986), Undang -Undang Pokok Agraria Dalam Praktek , Jakarta, C.V. Mitra Sari.