Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the Self-Directed Learning model and Discovery Learning model in increasing the learning independence of students in historical subjects. The research design used a quasi-experimental with a pretest-posttest control group with data analysis techniques using a paired sample T-test. The sample in this study was class X students at SMAN Kalisat Jember. The research instrument uses a measuring tool for student independence, namely in the form of a questionnaire with a rating scale model. The results of the t-test analysis show the average value of students' independent learning with the Self-Directed Learning of 61.36. Meanwhile, the average value of independent learning of students with the Discovery Learning model is 56.03, it shows that the Self-Directed Learning model is more effective in improving students' independent learning with a high effectiveness of 0.88.

Keywords:

Self-Directed Learning, Discovery Learning, Learning Independence

References:

1) Abrar. 2015. Pembelajaran Sejarah dan Teacherpreneur. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, 4(2)

2) Al Kandari, A. M., & Al Qattan, M. M. 2020. E-task-based learning approach to enhancing 21st-century learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 551–566. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13136a.

3) Alfeiri, L., Brooks, P.J., Adrich, N.J., & Tenenbaum, H.R. 2011. Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhcance Learning? Journal of Educational Psychology. 103(1):1-18.

4) Amri, S. 2015. Implementasi Pembelajaran Aktif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakaraya.

5) Anaelka, A. H. 2018. Education 4.0 Made Simple: Ideas for Teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92.

6) Anagun, Sengul.S. 2018. Teachers’ Perceptions about the Relationship between 21st Century Skills and Managing Constructivist Learning Environments. International Journal of Instruction. 11(4): 825-840.

7) Anderson, L.W. & Krathwolh, D.R. 2001. A taxonomy for learning, Teaching, and Assesing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxomony of Educational Objectives. New York: David McKay Company.

8) Boholano, H.B. 2017. Smart Social Networking: 21st Century Teaching And Learning Skills. Research in Pedagogy. 7(1):21-29.

9) Bruner, J.S. 1966. Toward a teory of Instruction. London: Harvard University Press

10) Chusni, M. M., Saputro, S., Suranto, S., & Rahardjo, S. B. (2020). Review of critical thinking skill in indonesia: Preparation of the 21st century learner. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(09), 1230– 1235. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.09.223

11) Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates

12) Cohen,Louis., Lawewncw Manion dan Keith Morrison. 2018. Research Methods in Education (8th Edition). London : Routledge.

13) Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227e268.

14) Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and Education. New York : Simon & Schuster

15) Ellinger, A.D. 2004. “The Concept of Self-Directed Learning and its Implications for Human Resource Development”. Advances in Developing Human Resources. Vol. 6 No. 2. pp. 158-177.

16) Foo, S. Y., & Hussain, R. M. R. (2010). Self-directed learning in a socioconstructivist learning environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1913–1917.

17) Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed Learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18e33.

18) Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W.A. (2015). Teaching and Learning with Technology: Effectiveness of ICT Integration in Schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1, 175-191.

19) Gulicheva, E., Lisin, E., Osipova, M., & Khabdullin, A. (2017). Leading factors in the formation of innovative education environment. Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 129–137. doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-2/9

20) Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

21) Ilhan, A., & Gülersoy, A. E. (2019). Discovery learning strategy in geographical education: A sample of lesson design. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 9(3), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.672975

22) Kirkman, S., Coughlin, K., & Kromrey, J. 2007. Correlates of satisfaction and success in self-directed learning: relationships with school experience, course format, and internet use. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning. 4(1). 39-52.

23) Kivunja, Charles. (2015). Exploring the Pedagogical Meaning and Implications of the 4Cs " Super Skills " for the 21 st Century through Bruner's 5E Lenses of Knowledge Construction to Improve Pedagogies of the New Learning Paradigm. Creative Education. 6. 224-239.

24) Knowles, M. (1975). Self-Directed Learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press.

25) Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (Vol. 8). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge

26) Meindrawati, Aries. 2018. Penerapan Metode Discovery Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemandirian dan Hasil Belajar Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Kelas XII IPS 1 MAN 1 Jember Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018. Skripsi. Tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Jember.

27) Merriam, S. B., Caffarella, R. S., & Baumgartner, L. M. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc.

28) Ott, L. E., Carpenter, T. S., Hamilton, D. S., & LaCourse, W. R. (2018). Discovery Learning: Development of a Unique Active Learning Environment for Introductory Chemistry. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 18(4).

29) Plews, R. C. (2017). Self-Directed in Online Learning. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 1(14), 37-57.

30) Priskila, M. et al. 2014. Implentasi Metode Project Based Leaning untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas dan Hasil Belajar Sejarah Peserta Didik Kelas X3 SMAN 1 Bondowoso Semester Genap Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014. Skripsi, Jember : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Jember

31) Priyanti, Na'im, M., & Soepeno, B. 2015. Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Discovery Berbasis Authentic Assessment untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Sejarah Peserta Didik Kelas X PMT 2 SMK Negeri 5 Jember Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015. Artikel Mahasiswa 1 (1). 1-9

32) Priyanti, U.P. 2019. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Self Directed Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kemandirian dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Kelas XI IPS 2 MAN 1 Jember Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018. Skripsi. Jember: Program Sarjana Fakultas KePendidikan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Jember.

33) Rufaidah, L. N., Umamah, N., & Surya, R. A. 2021. Learning environment technology-based in improving students’ independent learning. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 747, No. 1, p. 012056). IOP Publishing.

34) Safitri, D., Umamah, N., & Sumardi. 2019. Accelerated Learning Integrated by Discovery Learning in History Course: How Z Generation Learn. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 243.

35) Schweder,S. and Raufelder, D. 2019. Positive emotions, learning behavior and teacher support in selfdirected learning during adolescence: Do age and gender matter?. Journal of Adolescence 73. 73–84

36) Shahroom, A. A., & Hussin, N. (2018). Industrial Revolution 4.0 and Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8, 314-319. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i9/4593

37) Song, L., & Hill, J. R. 2007. A conceptual model for understanding selfdirected learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning. 6(1). 27-42

38) Steinberg, Lawrence. 2002. Adolescence. Sixth edition, New York: McGraw Hill Inc.

39) Tough, A. (1979). The Adult’s Learning Projects: A Fresh Approach to Theory and Practice in Adult Learning (2nd ed.). Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

40) Umamah, N. 2012. "Rekonstruksi Kurikulum Upaya Vital yang Dilematis" dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Rekonstruksi Kurikulum Berbasis Karakter Da-lam menyongsong Pemberlakuan Kurikulum 2013. Program Studi Pendidikan Digital Repository Universitas Jember Sejarah Universitas Jember, 42-54

41) Umamah, N. 2015. Teachers, "Innovative Instructional Design and a Good Char-acter in information Era" dalam Proceeding of International Seminar Educa-tion for Nation Character Building. STKIP PGRI Tulung Agung, 231-235

42) Umamah, N. 2017. Pembelajaran Sejarah Kesiapannya Menghadapi Tantangan Zaman” dalam Kapita Selekta (Pendidikan) Sejarah Indonesia Jilid 4. Yogyakarta: Ombak.

43) Umamah, N. 2019. Desain Pembelajaran. Malang: Intelegensi Media

44) Umamah, N., Sumardi, Marjono, & Hartono, F. P. (2020). Teacher Perspective: Innovative, Adaptive, and Responsive Instructional Design Aimed at Life Skills. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental 485. IOP Publishing

45) Umamah, N., Surya, R. A., & Muffida, E. 2021. Teachers’ ability analysis of developing innovative instructional design. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 747, No. 1, p. 012070). IOP Publishing