Abstract
The study investigated the problem-solving skills of the undergraduates in Southwestern Nigeria. It also ascertained the relationship between self-regulation and problem solving skills of the students. The study also examined the level of problem solving skills and self-regulation of the undergraduates. The study also investigated the correlation between socio demographic variable (sex) and problem-solving skills of the of the students in the zone. The study adopted descriptive survey research design. The study population comprised 378,982 undergraduate students. The sample size was 1,442 students which were selected using multistage sampling procedure. Three states were selected out of six states in southwest using simple random sampling technique and from each of the three states; one federal, one state and one private university were selected using simple random sampling technique. From each university, two faculties were selected using simple random sampling technique and from each faculty, four departments were selected using simple random sampling technique. Two adapted instruments titled ProblemSolving Skills Questionnaire (PSQ) and Self-Regulation Scale (SRS) were used to obtain data from the undergraduate students. Data collected for the study were analysed using frequency counts, simple percentages, and Point Biserial Correlation. The results indicated that 36.1%, 31.7% and 28.1% of undergraduates in Southwestern Nigeria demonstrated low, moderate and high problem solving skills respectively. The results also showed that 35.0, 26.8 and 30.8 of undergraduates in Southwestern Nigeria demonstrated low, moderate and high self-regulation respectively. The findings of the study also revealed that there was a significant relationship between self-regulation and problem solving skills (N=1426, rpb=0.298, p ˂ 0.05). Finally, the results of the study showed that there was a significant relationship between sex and problem solving skills (N=1426, rpb=0.130, p˂ 0.05).
References:
1) Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A
natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8.
2) Vukman, K. B, & Licardo, M. (2010). How cognitive, metacognitive, motivational and emotional self-regulation
influence school performance in adolescence and early adulthood. Educational Studies, 36(3), 259-268.
3) Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (2003). The Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Contextual Teaching: Principals and
Practices for Teacher Preparation. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED479905.pdf
4) Loyens, S. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem based learning and its relationships
with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 411-427.
5) Gonzalez, John A. (2012). Mechanisms of transfer: Modeling motivational and self-regulatory processes that promote
transfer of learning (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Syracuse University:
http://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article=1053&context=idde_etd
6) Metallidou, P. (2009). Pre-service and in-service teachers’ metacognitive knowledge about problem-solving strategies.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 76-82.
7) Hung, W., Jonassen, D. H., & Liu, R. (2008). Problem-based learning. In J. M. Spector, J. G. van Merriënboer, M. D.,
Merrill, & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 485-
506). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8) Olofin A. A. (2018). Self-regulation as of Creativity among Secondary School students in Ondo State. Unpublished
Thesis; Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
9) OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Develo pment. (2010). PISA 2012 problem solving framework
(draft for fi eld trial). Paris: OECD.
10) Aslan, E. A. (Ed.). (2012). Örgütte kişisel gelişim. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncilik.
11) National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston,
VA.
12) Fischer, A., Greiff , S., & Funke, J. (2012). The process of solving complex problems. Journal of Problem Solving, 4, 19–
42.
13) Novick, L. R., & Bassok, M. (2015). Problem solving. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge
handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 321–349). Cambridge, NY: University Press.
14) Greiff , S., & Fischer, A. (2013). Der Nutzen einer Komplexen Problemlösekompetenz: Theoretische Überlegungen und
empirische Befunde [Usefulness of Complex Problem Solving competency: Theoretical considerations and empirical
results]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 27, 1–13.
15) Van Streun, A. (2014). Hoe staat ons Nederlands wiskundeonderwijs ervoor? Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde, 2, 42-51.
16) Schoenfeld, A. H. (2007). What is mathematical proficiency and how can it be assessed? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.),
Assessing mathematical proficiency (pp. 59-73). New York: Cambridge University Press.